The facts behind Trident

The UK government is due to vote this evening on whether or not the country's nuclear deterrent, Trident, should be renewed. Beside the obvious moral implications of such a vote, at an expected cost of at least 31 billion pounds to replace the four soon to be decommissioned submarines, even MPs in favour of keeping a nuclear arsenal will be mulling over the pros and cons of such a significant financial commitment.

Since 1969 there has been, at any one time, a so-called Continuous At Sea Deterrence (CASD) tasked with protecting the United Kingdom's sovereignty in the event of an attack of similar magnitude from one of the globes other nuclear powers. The fleet of four subs is now due to be replaced, should the government vote in favour of the plan.

Once in-service, the vessels are forecast to cost around six percent of the UK's total defence budget. The question being asked by many today is, is it worth it?

Description

This chart covers key facts and figures regarding Trident and its potential renewal.

Download Chart
Premium statistics
Nuclear weapons spending of the world's nuclear armed countries 2022
British attitudes on if they should keep their nuclear weapons 2019-2024
Premium statistics
U.S. budget of nuclear weapons stockpile FY 2021-2027, by funding component
Number of nuclear weapons worldwide 1945-2024
Annual operational cost of nuclear deterrence in the UK 2010-2025
Premium statistics
Timeline of successful and failed ballistic missile tests by North Korea 1984-2024

Any more questions?

Get in touch with us quickly and easily.
We are happy to help!

Do you still have questions?

Feel free to contact us anytime using our contact form or visit our FAQ page.

Statista Content & Design

Need infographics, animated videos, presentations, data research or social media charts?

More Information