UNESCO has added 24 new sites to the World Heritage List, bringing the total number to 1,223 worldwide. As the following chart shows, there is an uneven distribution of where these sites are located, particularly in terms of the cultural heritage selection, with UNESCO having historically inscribed by far the largest number of this group to the Europe and North America category.
Despite the combined total land area for North America and Europe (34 million km²) being similar to that of Africa (30 million km²), 490 cultural sites have so far been inscribed in Europe and North America, compared to just 61 in Africa. The Asia and Pacific region have the second highest number of inscribed cultural sites at 211, followed by Latin America and the Caribbean with 103. In order to appear on the list, countries must put forward a site as a nomination. A UNESCO representative then visits the site and makes a recommendation to the organization, which informs the final decision.
There are many reasons a government may seek a UNESCO World Heritage badge, from the fact it can bring global awareness to a location and enhance tourism there, to how it can potentially impact the allocation of future funding. But at the same time, communities may be wary of putting forward a nomination due to risks such as over tourism and the costs of maintaining a World Heritage property. Or else it may simply be a lower priority in a given country.
For years, experts have criticized the award for being too Eurocentric. For example, The Conversation contributor Victoria Reyes commented on the topic in a 2019 article, citing how research shows that UNESCO “disproportionately reveres the cultural legacies of former European empires.” She highlights how, whether intentional or not, even in a practical sense, the long and bureaucratic nomination process favors governments that are able and willing to divert resources towards applications.
The gap may start to narrow in the coming years, however, as UNESCO says it is introducing measures such as trying to “improve the number of African heritage sites on the World Heritage List, through providing better support for African states carrying out local conservation projects and preparing World Heritage nomination files.”
